Find evidence by the question you need to answer

Research explained
before you open the paper.

Search by topic, researcher, or court argument. If you want the relevant papers already organised, start with a quick research guide instead.

Browse by the question you need to answer

Research library

28 of 28 records

Every result explains what the research can help you understand before showing the formal paper title.

2022
SynthesisConflict and shared care

What do children, parents, and quantitative studies say about living arrangements, relationships, conflict, practical problems, and children's wellbeing after separation?

The review found that children experienced shared care in different ways. Some found different rules and routines, exchange days, distance between homes, friendships, activities, and belonging difficult. Most children in the qualitative studies were satisfied with shared care because they valued substantial contact with both parents. Relationships within the family, parental conflict, communication, parental health, and finances reduced or sometimes removed measured differences between care arrangements.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The reviewers concluded that no single arrangement can be recommended for every family from the available evidence. Family relationships, communication, conflict, practical conditions, flexibility, and the child's views may be as important as the percentage of time itself.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to examine whether conflict or court involvement by itself establishes that shared care is harmful, and where violence, coercive control, abuse, neglect, or another safety risk changes the analysis.

Read it with this limit in mind Only one eligible recent prospective cohort addressed causal outcome differences

Full citation

Custody and living arrangements after parents separate: Implications for children and adolescents

Trine B. Johansen, Hege Nøkleby, Lars J. Langøien & Tiril C. Borge (2022). Custody and living arrangements after parents separate: Implications for children and adolescents. Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Systematic review40 studies, including 17 qualitative and 23 quantitative studiesChildren and adolescents aged 0 to 19
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2021
ObservationalConflict and shared care

Did parental conflict change the relationship between shared care and children's mental health?

Shared care was associated with better child mental health overall, while high parental conflict was associated with worse mental health. When conflict was high, children in shared care and children living mainly with one parent had similar levels of mental health problems. The shared-care advantage was therefore not visible in the high-conflict group.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The author concluded that shared care is not a one-size-fits-all arrangement and that its mental-health advantage in this sample appeared when parental conflict was low.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to examine whether conflict or court involvement by itself establishes that shared care is harmful, and where violence, coercive control, abuse, neglect, or another safety risk changes the analysis.

Read it with this limit in mind Cross-sectional design cannot establish what caused the outcome

Full citation

The relation between joint physical custody, interparental conflict, and children's mental health

Lara Augustijn (2021). The relation between joint physical custody, interparental conflict, and children's mental health. Journal of Family Research, 33(3), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-621

Cross-sectional family study1,087 post-separation familiesChildren in post-separation families
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2019
ObservationalConflict and shared care

How did parents manage routines, communication, transitions, and children's adjustment in equal shared care?

Parents described using communication books, similar basic sleep and food routines, schedule changes, preschool transfers, and extra contact when a child missed the other parent. Some accepted different rules in each home and believed children could adapt. Others found the differences difficult. Most parents thought their children had adapted well, with the notable exception of families experiencing continuing conflict.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that these parents worked actively to make shared care function. Communication and adjustment were important, but the study did not show that both homes must be identical. Ongoing conflict and lack of confidence in the other parent's care were the clearest sources of dissatisfaction.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to examine whether conflict or court involvement by itself establishes that shared care is harmful, and where violence, coercive control, abuse, neglect, or another safety risk changes the analysis.

Read it with this limit in mind Parents were volunteers and may not represent all separated families

Full citation

We also communicate through a book in the diaper bag: Separated parents' ways to coparent and promote adaptation of their 1 to 4 year olds in equal joint physical custody

Malin Bergström, Anna Sarkadi, Anders Hjern & Emma Fransson (2019). We also communicate through a book in the diaper bag: Separated parents' ways to coparent and promote adaptation of their 1 to 4 year olds in equal joint physical custody. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0214913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214913

Qualitative interview study46 parents of 50 childrenChildren aged 1 to 4 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2018
SynthesisConflict and shared care

When parental conflict is high, do greater parenting time and shared care help or harm children?

The review found a genuinely mixed pattern. Four studies linked more father contact with more child problems when conflict remained high several years after divorce, and three of those results differed by the child's sex. Studies measuring conflict during divorce or within the next two or three years were mixed. Three studies found no significant interaction between conflict and parenting time. Better-quality parenting by either parent was associated with fewer child problems in several high-conflict samples.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that prolonged high conflict may make greater parenting time harder for some children, while good parenting by either parent can be protective. They did not support a universal rule for or against shared care and called for decisions to consider conflict duration, parenting quality, child characteristics, and the limits of the evidence.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to examine whether conflict or court involvement by itself establishes that shared care is harmful, and where violence, coercive control, abuse, neglect, or another safety risk changes the analysis.

Read it with this limit in mind Only 11 heterogeneous studies were reviewed

Full citation

Does shared parenting help or hurt children in high-conflict divorced families?

Nicole E. Mahrer, Karey L. O'Hara, Irwin N. Sandler & Sharlene A. Wolchik (2018). Does shared parenting help or hurt children in high-conflict divorced families? Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 59(4), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1454200

Narrative review11 studies of parenting time, parenting quality, conflict, and child adjustmentChildren and adolescents after parental separation
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2024
SynthesisMultiple attachments

Do young children with secure relationships to both parents have better language skills?

Children with secure attachment relationships to both parents had somewhat better language skills than children with one secure parent relationship or none. Secure relationships with mothers and fathers were equally relevant to the result.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors interpreted the findings as supporting the comparable importance of attachment to both parents for the developmental outcome studied.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when examining claims that a child can only have one important attachment or that one parent's relationship must be secondary.

Read it with this limit in mind Seven contributing studies, published from 1985–2014

Full citation

Configurations of mother–child and father–child attachment relationships as predictors of child language competence

Dagan, Schuengel, Verhage, Madigan, Roisman et al. (2024). Configurations of mother–child and father–child attachment relationships as predictors of child language competence. Child Development, 95(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13998

Individual participant data meta-analysis719 children across 7 studiesMean 19.8 months
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2018
SynthesisShared parenting

Across 60 studies, did children in shared care generally do better, worse, or about the same as children living mainly with one parent?

The review examined 60 studies. In 34 studies, children in shared care did better on every outcome measured. In 14, they did better on some outcomes and the same on the rest. In 6, the groups did equally well. In the final 6, shared-care children had one poorer result but did equally well or better on the other outcomes. None of the 60 studies found that shared-care children did worse on every outcome measured.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The author concluded that the pattern was not explained solely by family income, parental conflict, or parent–child relationship quality in the reviewed literature.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Narrative review rather than a pooled meta-analysis

Full citation

Joint versus sole physical custody: Children’s outcomes independent of parent–child relationships, income, and conflict in 60 studies

Linda Nielsen (2018). Joint versus sole physical custody: Children’s outcomes independent of parent–child relationships, income, and conflict in 60 studies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 59(4), 247–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1454204

Narrative review60 studiesChildren and adolescents
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2017
SynthesisConflict and shared care

Does high parental conflict or poor coparenting automatically mean that shared physical custody will produce worse outcomes?

Nielsen reviewed 17 studies that accounted for parental conflict when comparing shared physical custody with children living mainly with one parent. She reported that 16 found better outcomes on most measures for the shared-care group after conflict was considered. Across overlapping outcome categories, all 9 studies assessing father relationships or stress-related health favoured shared care; 6 of 9 behavioural studies favoured shared care and 3 found equal outcomes; 8 of 12 social and emotional studies favoured shared care and 4 found equal outcomes; and 2 of 5 academic studies favoured shared care while 3 found equal outcomes.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The author concluded that conflict, including legal conflict, should not by itself rule out shared physical custody. She treated the quality of each parent-child relationship as a stronger average predictor, while excluding coercive controlling violence, ongoing severe abuse, neglect, and other circumstances requiring protection from the ordinary application of the review.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to examine whether conflict or court involvement by itself establishes that shared care is harmful, and where violence, coercive control, abuse, neglect, or another safety risk changes the analysis.

Read it with this limit in mind Narrative review rather than a preregistered systematic review

Full citation

Re-examining the research on parental conflict, coparenting, and custody arrangements

Linda Nielsen (2017). Re-examining the research on parental conflict, coparenting, and custody arrangements. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000109

Narrative reviewReview of conflict, coparenting, and custody studiesChildren and adolescents
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2017
ObservationalOvernight care

How is overnight parenting time in infancy and toddlerhood associated with later parent–child relationships?

Young adults who had spent more nights with their fathers before age three reported stronger later relationships with their fathers. Their relationships with their mothers were not weaker. The pattern remained after the researchers took account of several measured differences between the families, but the study could not prove that overnights caused the later relationships.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors interpreted the findings as support for frequent overnight parenting time in ordinary circumstances, while explicitly noting that the design did not establish causality.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Retrospective reports can be affected by recall

Full citation

Should infants and toddlers have frequent overnight parenting time with fathers? The policy debate and new data

William V. Fabricius & Go Woon Suh (2017). Should infants and toddlers have frequent overnight parenting time with fathers? The policy debate and new data. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000108

Retrospective observational studyYoung adults and their separated parentsOvernights before age 3; later relationships assessed retrospectively
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2014
ConsensusParenting plans

What does the developmental literature imply for parenting plans and overnights for young children whose parents live apart?

The report challenged blanket restrictions on young children's overnight care and said courts must consider the risk of weakening or losing the father-child relationship as well as possible attachment concerns. Citing the Stanford Custody Project, it reported father dropout of 56% with daytime-only contact versus 1.6% with overnight contact for children under three when their parents separated. For children aged three to five, the reported figures were 49% versus 7.7%. For families described as high conflict, Warshak argued against an automatic exclusion. He recommended examining the source and pattern of conflict, the quality of each parent's care, and whether practical protections such as school, daycare, or neutral-location transfers could keep children away from hostile exchanges.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The report concluded that, in ordinary safe circumstances, regular care including overnights can help fathers remain committed and involved. It did not propose one schedule for every child. It said conflict must be understood rather than treated as a label, and that ordinary recommendations do not apply automatically where violence, abuse, neglect, coercive control, or another serious safety risk requires protection.

Why this report may be useful

Use this paper to identify the child, relationship, safety, caregiving, conflict, and practical factors that research says should shape a parenting plan.

Read it with this limit in mind Consensus reports are not primary empirical studies

Full citation

Social science and parenting plans for young children: A consensus report

Richard A. Warshak, with endorsers listed in the article (2014). Social science and parenting plans for young children: A consensus report. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000005

Consensus report and literature reviewLiterature review; 110 listed endorsersBirth to 4 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2013
ObservationalOvernight care

Were frequent overnight stays linked with infant attachment security or later emotional and behavioural problems?

The study produced mixed results. Infants who frequently stayed overnight were more likely to be classified as insecurely attached, although the study could not prove that overnights caused this difference. The toddler result was uncertain. When the children were assessed at ages 3 and 5, frequent overnights did not predict more emotional or behavioural adjustment problems.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors described the issue as understudied and reported different patterns by developmental stage and outcome.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Observational design

Full citation

Overnight custody arrangements, attachment, and adjustment among very young children

Tornello, Emery, Rowen, Potter, Ocker & Xu (2013). Overnight custody arrangements, attachment, and adjustment among very young children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(4), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12045

Longitudinal observational studyFragile Families and Child Wellbeing StudyBirth to 3 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2002
SynthesisShared parenting

Across 33 studies, how did children in joint custody compare on emotional health, behaviour, self-esteem, and family relationships?

Children in joint legal or physical custody had better average results than children in sole custody for emotional and behavioural problems, self-esteem, family relationships, general wellbeing, and coping with divorce. Their average results were similar to children in families where the parents had not separated.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The author stated that the results were consistent with joint custody being advantageous in some cases, possibly through continued positive involvement with both parents.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Joint legal and joint physical custody were combined in parts of the analysis

Full citation

Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review

Robert Bauserman (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91

Meta-analysis33 studies included in the meta-analysisChildren and adolescents
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
1999
ObservationalOvernight care

Did infants who stayed overnight with their fathers show more attachment insecurity, and what family conditions were linked with the result?

Infants in the overnight group were more often placed in concerning attachment categories than infants in the married-parent comparison group. Within the overnight group, the most concerning attachment pattern was more common where parents communicated poorly, had high conflict, or struggled to help the infant feel emotionally protected.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors linked concern about repeated separations to conditions in which parents could not provide adequate psychological support to the infant.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Small separated-family subgroups

Full citation

The development of attachment in separated and divorced families: Effects of overnight visitation, parent and couple variables

Judith Solomon & Carol George (1999). The development of attachment in separated and divorced families: Effects of overnight visitation, parent and couple variables. Attachment & Human Development, 1(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616739900134011

Comparative observational study145 infants and mothers; 83 fathers12–20 months
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
1997
SynthesisAttachment theory

Does noticing and responding to a baby's needs help the baby develop a secure attachment?

Children were more likely to have secure attachments when caregivers noticed their signals and responded appropriately. The relationship was meaningful but modest, so responsive care matters without being the only influence on attachment.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that responsive care matters, but attachment cannot be explained by one caregiver behaviour alone. The child, family, stress, culture, and wider caregiving context also matter.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to separate established attachment findings from claims that attachment theory does not actually prove in an individual parenting case.

Read it with this limit in mind Substantial variation in constructs and measures across studies

Full citation

Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment

Marinus H. van IJzendoorn & Marianne S. De Wolff (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04218.x

Meta-analysis66 studies; 4,176 parent-infant pairsInfancy
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
1999
SynthesisAttachment theory

What does a disorganised attachment classification mean, what may contribute to it, and does it predict later difficulties?

The review found that trained researchers could identify the pattern with reasonable consistency. Children given this classification were more likely, on average, to have later difficulty managing stress or controlling outward behaviour such as aggression. Many children did not develop those problems.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors treated disorganised attachment as a warning sign that may increase risk, not a diagnosis or a prediction of what must happen to an individual child.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to separate established attachment findings from claims that attachment theory does not actually prove in an individual parenting case.

Read it with this limit in mind Contributing studies varied in population and measurement

Full citation

Disorganized attachment in early childhood: Meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae

van IJzendoorn, Schuengel & Bakermans-Kranenburg (1999). Disorganized attachment in early childhood: Meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Development and Psychopathology, 11(2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579499002035

Series of meta-analysesNearly 80 studies; more than 6,000 parent-child pairsInfancy and early childhood
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2000
SynthesisParenting plans

How should knowledge about attachment, parental involvement, and young children’s development inform parenting plans after separation?

The review recommended frequent contact with both parents for young children when both relationships were established and care was adequate. For children younger than two or three, the authors preferred contact every day or every other day. They considered most two-year-olds capable of two consecutive overnights with either parent, while advising against five-to-seven-day separations for toddlers. By approximately seven or eight, most children could usually manage five-to-seven-day separations.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors supported preserving meaningful relationships with both parents through schedules matched to the child's developmental capacity. Their examples show that equal care and the length of each residential block are separate questions. They did not propose a strict rule limiting consecutive nights away from either parent to one night for each year of the child's age, or one schedule for every child.

Why this report may be useful

Use this paper to identify the child, relationship, safety, caregiving, conflict, and practical factors that research says should shape a parenting plan.

Read it with this limit in mind A research-to-practice review rather than a trial of particular custody schedules

Full citation

Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children

Joan B. Kelly & Michael E. Lamb (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00577.x

Developmental research reviewNarrative integration of developmental literatureInfants and young children
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2010
ObservationalOvernight care

Did some very young children in shared overnight care show more difficulty settling, sleeping, or managing distress?

The report found poorer results on some measures intended to reflect settling and emotional regulation among selected groups of very young children in shared overnight care. The pattern did not appear across every age, measure, or source of information. The authors said age, conflict, established care, and family circumstances should be considered together.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The report urged caution in applying equal-time policy concepts to infants and very young children without developmental and relational assessment.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Observational data cannot establish that schedules caused outcomes

Full citation

Post-separation parenting arrangements: Patterns and developmental outcomes in two risk groups

Jennifer McIntosh, Bruce Smyth, Margaret Kelaher, Yvonne Wells & Caroline Long (2010). Post-separation parenting arrangements: Patterns and developmental outcomes in two risk groups. Australian Institute of Family Studies / Attorney-General’s Department.

Government-commissioned observational researchTwo Australian studies, including high-conflict and very-young-child groupsInfants, preschoolers, and school-age children
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2014
ConsensusOvernight care

Can attachment needs and early involvement by both parents be integrated when considering overnights after separation?

The authors described attachment and parental involvement as complementary rather than mutually exclusive. They rejected blanket prohibition while retaining caution about frequent schedules where a relationship is not established or conflict is high.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that planning should protect the child's secure relationships with both parents, while matching the schedule to the child's age, established care, safety, conflict, and ability to manage transitions.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Consensus integration is not a new causal test

Full citation

Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part I: Consensus through theoretical and empirical integration

Marsha Kline Pruett, Jennifer E. McIntosh & Joan B. Kelly (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part I: Consensus through theoretical and empirical integration. Family Court Review, 52(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12087

Integrative review and consensus paperIntegrated attachment and parental-involvement evidenceInfants and young children
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2016
SynthesisShared parenting

Across 19 studies, did children in shared care have better or worse emotional, behavioural, and social outcomes than children living mainly with one parent?

When the 19 studies were combined, children in shared care had slightly better emotional, behavioural, and social outcomes on average. The difference was small. Families were not randomly assigned, so the review could not prove that shared care caused the advantage.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that the overall pattern favoured shared care, while recognising that family differences and weaknesses in the original studies limited how confidently cause could be claimed.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Predominantly observational studies

Full citation

Child adjustment in joint physical custody versus sole custody: A meta-analytic review

Amandine Baude, Jessica Pearson & Sylvie Drapeau (2016). Child adjustment in joint physical custody versus sole custody: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 57(5), 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2016.1185203

Meta-analysisStudies comparing joint and sole physical custodyChildren and adolescents
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2019
SynthesisShared parenting

Across international studies, did shared care generally help or harm children and parents?

The international studies generally reported positive results, but they defined shared care differently, studied different ages and outcomes, and came from different social and legal settings. These differences make a single universal conclusion unsafe.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The author concluded that the overall pattern was encouraging but still debated because shared-care families in the research often had more resources, less conflict, and had chosen the arrangement themselves.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Samples overrepresented higher-SES and lower-conflict families

Full citation

Children’s and parents’ well-being in joint physical custody: A literature review

Anja Steinbach (2019). Children’s and parents’ well-being in joint physical custody: A literature review. Family Process, 58(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12372

Literature review40 studies published from 2007–2018Predominantly ages 6–15
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2022
ConsensusFamily law research

What does modern attachment research reliably tell family courts, and what remains disputed?

The international group agreed that children need familiar caregivers who are safe, benefit from continuity of adequate care, and can benefit from important attachment relationships with several people. The experts disagreed about how much weight courts should place on formal attachment assessments in an individual case.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors recommended focusing court assessment on caregiving behaviour and using attachment measures mainly to guide support, not determine custody in isolation.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to understand what happened in real family-law systems and whether claims about conflict, wellbeing, or policy effects match the reported evidence.

Read it with this limit in mind Consensus statements integrate evidence but do not eliminate value judgments

Full citation

Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues

Forslund, Granqvist, van IJzendoorn, Sagi-Schwartz, Glaser, Steele, Hammarlund et al. (2022). Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues. Attachment & Human Development, 24(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1840762

International consensus statementInternational group of attachment researchers and practitionersChildren across developmental stages
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2017
ConsensusFamily law research

Did the 2014 consensus accurately represent the broader research community, and what misconceptions was it intended to correct?

Warshak argued that attachment theory was being overstated to claim that a child needs one psychologically primary parent or should generally be kept from overnight care with the other parent. He said the underlying research did not justify that level of certainty.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The article located the 2014 report within a wider dispute about how attachment research was being translated into professional and legal guidance.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to understand what happened in real family-law systems and whether claims about conflict, wellbeing, or policy effects match the reported evidence.

Read it with this limit in mind A single-author defence of an earlier consensus report

Full citation

Stemming the tide of misinformation: International consensus on shared parenting and overnighting

Richard A. Warshak (2017). Stemming the tide of misinformation: International consensus on shared parenting and overnighting. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

Scholarly commentary and evidence reviewCommentary on the 2014 consensus process and its evidence baseChildren under 4
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2018
SynthesisOvernight care

Do the studies used to support blanket overnight restrictions justify those restrictions when their designs and results are examined closely?

Warshak argued that prominent cautionary claims exceeded what the observational designs, measures, and reported findings could establish, and that overnight decisions should not be governed by blanket age rules.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The review supported regular overnights in ordinary circumstances while retaining exceptions for safety, poor care, and other child-specific concerns.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Critical review rather than a preregistered systematic review

Full citation

Night shifts: Revisiting blanket restrictions on children’s overnights with separated parents

Richard A. Warshak (2018). Night shifts: Revisiting blanket restrictions on children’s overnights with separated parents. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 59(4), 282–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1454193

Critical reviewCritical review of overnight studies and policy claimsInfants and young children
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2018
ObservationalFamily law research

Four years after Arizona encouraged roughly equal parenting time, did family-law professionals think the change increased conflict or worked well?

Judges, lawyers, mental-health providers, and court staff generally viewed the law positively. On average, they did not report an increase or decrease in legal disputes or conflict between parents. They did report small increases in allegations of domestic violence, child abuse, and substance abuse, which the study said required attention.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors argued that the policy experience did not support predictions of increased conflict, while documenting concerns that required continued attention.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to understand what happened in real family-law systems and whether claims about conflict, wellbeing, or policy effects match the reported evidence.

Read it with this limit in mind Professional perceptions rather than administrative causal estimates

Full citation

What happens when there is presumptive 50/50 parenting time? An evaluation of Arizona’s new child custody statute

Fabricius, Aaron, Akins, Assini & McElroy (2018). What happens when there is presumptive 50/50 parenting time? An evaluation of Arizona’s new child custody statute. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 59(5), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1454196

Statewide professional surveyJudges, attorneys, mental-health providers, and conciliation-court staffCourt-involved families generally
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2014
ConsensusParenting plans

How can attachment, development, and the future health of both parent–child relationships be translated into case-specific overnight planning?

The framework organized relevant considerations around the child, each parent–child relationship, coparenting conditions, safety, developmental capacities, and the practical demands of transitions.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors sought to protect early developmental security and both lifelong parent–child relationships rather than elevate either aim as an automatic trump.

Why this report may be useful

Use this paper to identify the child, relationship, safety, caregiving, conflict, and practical factors that research says should shape a parenting plan.

Read it with this limit in mind Practice framework rather than a primary study

Full citation

Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part II: Putting theory into practice

Jennifer E. McIntosh, Marsha Kline Pruett & Joan B. Kelly (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part II: Putting theory into practice. Family Court Review, 52(2), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12088

Clinical integration and practice frameworkCompanion practice paper to the 2014 evidence integrationBirth to 3 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2013
ObservationalOvernight care

Did parents report more sleeping, settling, or emotional difficulties among very young children who frequently stayed overnight?

Some groups of the youngest children in frequent overnight care had poorer results on selected parent-reported measures intended to reflect settling and emotional regulation. Other measures and age groups did not show the same pattern. Because families chose or received their existing schedules, the paper could not prove that overnights caused the differences.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors interpreted the findings as supporting developmental caution and closer attention to the conditions surrounding frequent overnight care for very young children.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research when an argument relies on infant age, overnight frequency, attachment security, regulation, or later parent-child relationships.

Read it with this limit in mind Cross-sectional observational design

Full citation

Overnight care patterns following parental separation: Associations with emotion regulation in infants and young children

Jennifer E. McIntosh, Bruce M. Smyth & Margaret Kelaher (2013). Overnight care patterns following parental separation: Associations with emotion regulation in infants and young children. Journal of Family Studies, 19(3), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2013.19.3.224

Cross-sectional observational studyYoung children in post-separation care arrangements drawn from an Australian national datasetInfants and young children
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2009
ObservationalFamily law research

What happened after the 2006 Australian family-law reforms, including patterns of care time and reported child wellbeing?

Sixteen percent of the 7,718 children in the care-time analysis were in shared care, defined as 35% to 65% of nights with each parent. Children in shared care were reported as doing as well as or better than children spending 1% to 34% of nights with their father. Fathers reported somewhat higher wellbeing in shared-care groups; mothers generally reported no significant difference between those groups.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The evaluation found no simple one-size-fits-all result. Shared care was functioning well for many families, while safety concerns, violence, conflict, and the circumstances of individual families remained essential to interpreting outcomes and the broader reforms.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to understand what happened in real family-law systems and whether claims about conflict, wellbeing, or policy effects match the reported evidence.

Read it with this limit in mind Observational comparisons cannot show that shared care caused better wellbeing

Full citation

Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms

Rae Kaspiew, Matthew Gray, Ruth Weston, Lawrie Moloney, Kelly Hand, Lixia Qu & the Family Law Evaluation Team (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms. Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Government evaluation using multiple national datasetsMultiple datasets, including 10,002 recently separated parents and care-time data for 7,718 childrenChildren from birth to 17 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2015
ObservationalShared parenting

Do children living in two homes report more headaches, sleep problems, stomach aches, sadness, or stress?

Children whose parents lived together reported the fewest sleep problems, concentration difficulties, headaches, stomach aches, tension, sadness, dizziness, and appetite loss. Among children with separated parents, those in shared care reported fewer of these symptoms than children living mostly or only with one parent.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors concluded that the practical stress of moving between homes did not outweigh the advantages associated with maintaining everyday relationships and resources in both parental households in this sample.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation

Full citation

Fifty moves a year: Is there an association between joint physical custody and psychosomatic problems in children?

Malin Bergström, Emma Fransson, Bitte Modin, Marie Berlin, Per A. Gustafsson & Anders Hjern (2015). Fifty moves a year: Is there an association between joint physical custody and psychosomatic problems in children? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(8), 769–774. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-205058

National cross-sectional surveyNearly 150,000 schoolchildren in a national classroom survey12- and 15-year-olds
Read the full summary, evidence, and source
2018
ObservationalShared parenting

How do psychological symptoms among preschool children in joint physical custody compare with children living mostly or only with one parent?

Children in shared care had fewer reported psychological symptoms than children living mostly or only with one parent. Parents and preschool teachers both reported results in the same direction, although the differences were modest.

Open summary and publication detailsClose this paper
What the researchers concluded

The authors reported that joint physical custody was not associated with greater psychological symptoms in preschool children and that both parent and teacher reports favoured joint care over mostly or only one-parent residence.

Why this report may be useful

Use this research to compare children's emotional health, behaviour, physical symptoms, school life, and family relationships in shared-care and mostly-one-parent homes.

Read it with this limit in mind Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation

Full citation

Preschool children living in joint physical custody arrangements show less psychological symptoms than those living mostly or only with one parent

Malin Bergström, Emma Fransson, Helena Fabian, Anders Hjern, Anna Sarkadi & Marie Salari (2018). Preschool children living in joint physical custody arrangements show less psychological symptoms than those living mostly or only with one parent. Acta Paediatrica, 107(2), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14004

Cross-sectional population study3,656 preschool children3 to 5 years
Read the full summary, evidence, and source